What Are the Various Biological Cause of Depression Flashcards

What are the various biological causes of depression? Depression is a disorder that is affecting a lot of people in the world today, and not everyone is as quick to speak about their journey. To help you understand the causes of this disorder, we have prepared some flashcards. All the best as you read through them and hope you know them.

24 cards   |   Total Attempts: 182
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
Who suggests 4 types of circumstantial evidence as to why we might believe depression is a biological condition and what are they? What do they point out about these facts?
Hammen (1997): some symptoms are somatic; depression runs in families; antidepressant medication reduces the symptoms of depression; we know certain medical conditions and drugs induce depression. Hammen points out that none of these facts are strong enough evidence for depression having a biological nature of depression.
What is well known about depression in terms of families and psychological factors (3 points)? Therefore, what?
It is well known that: psychological factors can lead to physical symptoms; patterns of family interaction and the modelling of depressed behaviour can cause patterns of behaviour; the way we think and feel can be passed on through families. Therefore, just because depression can be induced and treated biologically does not mean that depression naturally occurs.
What have we long known in terms of children, their parents, and depression?
We have long known that children of depressed parents are more vulnerable to depression than comparable children without depressed parents.
What is the strongest evidence for a genetic element to depression? Describe a study for this.
Twin studies are the strongest evidence for a genetic element to depression. A study for this is McGuffin et al (1996): they looked at 109 twin pairs with at least one parent being treated for depression: there was a 46% concordance rate in MZ (identical) twins and 20% of DZ (fraternal) twins in terms of those who had also reported suffering symptoms of depression.
What are the theoretical values based on shared genes in terms of depression?
The theoreticalv values based on shared genes: 50% for first degree relatives (parents and siblings); 25% for 2nd degree relatives.
Describe Gershon's (1990) findings.
In a review of 10 family studies, Gershon (1990) found rates for unipolar depression ranged between 7 and 30% in first degree relatives.
What did Weissman et al (1984) find to support a genetic element for depression? However, what could their findings be accounted for?
Weissman et al (1984): relatives of a depressive below the age of 20 were 8x more likely to be diagnosed with depression than is they had a non-depressed relative. However, this could be due to life changes and social readjustment during this time.
What is a strength of adoption studies in terms of depression?
A strength of these sorts of studies is that it takes potential depressives away from the relatives that might lead them to depression - they can show whether depression is solely biological.
Wender et al (1986) found what?
Wender et al found that if an adopted child has depression, members of their biological family are 8x times more likely to be diagnosed with depression than members of their adoptive family.
Who found the 5-HTT gene being linked to depression and what did they find, specifically?
Hecimovic and Gilliam (2006) found that the 5-HTT gene, linked to the transmission of serotonin, appears to be abnormal in unipolar depressives.
In terms of evidence for BOTH genetic and environmental factors, describe Silberg et al's (1999) study. (DON'T NAME FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS)
Silberg et al studied the influence of genetic factors and life stress on depression among adolescent girls. Their aim was to assess the role of genes and recent life events. They studied 902 pairs of twins: 182 girls and 273 boys were pre-pubertal in age girls and 171 boys were at puberty. Each completed a standard psychiatric interview to assess depression; life events were measured with questionnaires given out and with an interview with parents. Differences in boys and girls and links to see how genes and life events worked together to cause depression were assessed.
What were Silberg et al's findings (results)?
Silberg et al found that, overall, girls suffered more depression than boys - on average they were more susceptible to depression in response to life events. There were wider individual differences among the girls in their response to these life events. 58% of girls who suffered depression after a negative life event also had a twin who suffered depression. This suggests the important role for genes in detemining individual differences in vulnerability to depression in response to life events.
What were Silberg et al's conclusions?
The study supported a role for both genes and environment (in the form of life events) in the development of depression. It gives us an indication as to how genes operates and it seems that, rather than causing depression directly, genetic factors make us particularly susceptible to the depressing effects of life events.
In terms of the biomedical theories of depression,what do the findings of Silberg et al (1999) suggest?
There is not a depression gene but some people are predisposed to being vulnerable to depression when unpleasant thing happen to them.
In terms of a possible relation between severe depression and a stronger genetic link, what did Kendler et al(1992) find?
Kendler et al (1992) used twin studies to explore mild MDD biological links - it was found that there was little difference between MZ (49%) and DZ (42%) and their chances of sharing depression - this suggests that milder depression may have less genetic influence, if any at all.